ZEITGEIST: MOVING FORWARD | OFFICIAL RELEASE | 2011


Array


Related Posts via Categories


17 Responses to ZEITGEIST: MOVING FORWARD | OFFICIAL RELEASE | 2011

  1. Now I am sure that most of you reading have a lot of skills under your belts. My proposal to you all is can we help each other in order to accomplish the little things that we set out to do. It’s going to be a long work in progress, because we have time to think about it but time is also slowly running out. We have to balance & give it enough time to where it is going to be mature enough of an idea & not too long to where we run out of time.

  2. I have a proposal to make to you soon enough. Question is how bad do you guys commonly want this to happen. I believe in you that you are better than this. Let’s attack this beast @ its core why are you so passive about it. I believe you should be a little bit more aggressive @ it & you should have your success. I think you have accomplished a lot by starting & generating a discussion amongst a lot of people & there is a lot more to accomplish. It is yours if you want it bad enough. Do you now?

  3. I have been thinking on & off about a change of ways to come. I tried to give this movement a no belonging outside vision of accelerating of the process that most of you imagined & dreamed. I want to start a spark of discussion & solutions to your arising problems. We must be creators not destroyers & go @ a steady pace with an accurate target. Got to have questions & some common goals that we will all try to achieve. Let’s beat these suckers @ their game, most people reading this will help you!

  4. @MRmattconnell
    those behind this system are, the majority of them, jewish, that is a simple fact, look at who owns all of the banks of the world, under them you have zionist fanatics and power hungry corporate gangsters, bill gates for example,

  5. @RelentlessProphet It would result in the expansion of the city/community. It’s not fucking rations. You take what you need. You eat if you’re hungry. There would be no reason to hoard any food or any other resources. The rate of consumption of the rate of production can be equalized fairly equally once there is no need to take more then you need. Resource management is not the same as limiting resources.

  6. @MRmattconnell
    There would be no reason to manage the population? What’s going to prevent families from having 5-6 kids in a system that gives them free food/water/resources/etc? Unless by sharing resources, you mean “here, one cracker per person = dinner” once the population goes far and beyond the # of resources available to sustain it…

  7. @JimmyRingo You are right. Actually that few of the people who somehow managed to owns the rest of us.

  8. @ivanosito
    The problem is the per-unit cost changes depending on which unit you’re talking about. The cost of making the tenth unit is greater than making the ninth, for example. Things can’t be priced by their individual costs because then you’d have a bunch of identical goods floating around all with different price tags, causing a shortage that stops goods from being allocated to their highest valued uses.

  9. BTW… I really like the voice of the narrator and the way he speaks, according to the idea being shown. Very good work.

  10. I like these ideas very much. I’ve always felt there was something wrong with the idea of money, and indeed with the idea of “interest” and “utility” or “profit”. When I was a kid I always wondered “How can everyone expect to sell everything for more than what it cost?”. It leads to there will be some people that would never earn, but will pay all the added-up “profits”. — Weird!